On the eve of self-rule, British ex-pats in Swaziland are coming to terms with their new lives - none more so than the Compton family. | score 2+ |
moviereview rates films from 1 (unwatchable) to 5 (unmissable) |
|
FIND A MOVIEREVIEW |
Cast Nicholas Hoult, Gabriel Byrne, Miranda Richardson, Emily Watson, Julie Walters Director Richard E. Grant Screenwriter Richard E. Grant Country UK / France / South Africa Rating / Running Time MA / 97 minutes Australian Release June 2006 Official Site (c) moviereview
2006
ABN 72 775 390 361 |
Richard
E. Grant’s directorial debut dives back half a century to a time when the British
Empire had all but crumbled and Swaziland was on the cusp of self-rule. This
seemingly unusual choice is a semi-autobiographical account that is part adolescent-awakening,
part family drama. Wah-Wah is seen
through the impressionable eyes of young Ralph Compton, son of the respected
Education Minister (Gabriel Byrne) whose wife (Miranda Richardson) leaves them
both. After boarding school, Ralph (Nicholas Hoult) returns to find his now
unemployed, alcoholic father has thrown pigeons among the ex-pats by marrying
an American air-hostess (Emily Watson). Her
wayward views, the parallel disintegration of the Compton family and that of the
British Empire should lend a neat line in satirical comment (think Evelyn Waugh
directing White Mischief). Grant
hasn’t really developed the chops to pull this thread with any satisfaction,
preferring to run with the conventional drama and tug at the comic potential of
the situation and his weighty cast. It’s one of the film’s bigger problems as the
presence of Richardson, Celia Imrie, Julie Walters and Fenella Woolgar constantly
overwhelm the drama, never shaking the notion that they are about to reprise Acorn Antiques at a moments notice. That they’re rehearsing Camelot for the Royal handover doesn’t
help. Wah-Wah is a game production with enough
material and star-power for a mini-series,
a tone that’s reinforced by Grant’s staccato pacing. He slides away from
the potential of historical value, edging always to the safety of the subject
he knows too well. It generates a lumpiness that pulls at the film’s more
convincing moments and, as amiable as it is, leaving one as confused about Grant’s
heartfelt intentions as his characters’ future in Swaziland. // COLIN FRASER |